skip to main content
10.1145/3576915.3624380acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Free Access

Poster: From Hashes to Ashes - A Comparison of Transcription Services

Published:21 November 2023Publication History


In recent years, semi-structured interviews gained more and more importance in cyber security research. Transcribing audio recordings of such interviews is a crucial step in qualitative data analysis, but it is also a work-intensive and time-consuming task. While outsourcing presents a common option, maintaining research quality requires precise transcriptions -- a task further compounded by technical jargon and established expressions in the research field. In this study, we compare different transcription services and evaluate their outcome quality within the context of cyber security. Our findings provide insights for researchers navigating the complex landscape of transcription services, offering informed choices to enhance the accuracy and validity of qualitative data analysis.


  1. Amazon Transcribe. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Amberscript. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. AssemblyAI. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Audiotranskription. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Maamoun M. Al-Aynati and Katherine A. Chorneyko. 2003. Comparison of voice-automated transcription and human transcription in generating pathology reports. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 127, 6, 721--725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Christina Davidson. 2009. Transcription. Imperatives for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 2, 35--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Alessandro Duranti. 2006. Transcripts, like shadows on a wall. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 4, 301--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Damjan Fujs, An?e Mihelič, and Simon L. R. Vrhovec. 2019. The power of interpretation. Qualitative methods in cybersecurity research. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security. New York, NY, USA, 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Google Cloud. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. GoTranscript. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Microsoft Azure. [n. d.] s/speech-to-text/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ann Morrison, Stephen Viller, Tamara Heck, and Kate Davis. 2017. Mixing quantitative with qualitative methods. Current practices in designing experiments, gathering data and analysis with mixed methods reporting. In Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction. New York, NY, USA, 654--655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. OpenAI. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Qualtranscribe. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman, Christine McLeavey, and Ilya Sutskever. 2023. Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning, 28492--28518.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rev. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Scribie. [n. d.] ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Salman Seyedi. 2023. A Comparison of HIPAA-Compliant Transcription Services for Virtual Psychiatric Interviews. Retrieved Aug. 16, 2023 from https://p ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Susanne Wollin-Giering, Markus Hoffmann, Jonas Höfting, and Carla Ventzke. 2023. Automatic transcription of qualitative interviews. Social Studies of Science and Technology. TU Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Poster: From Hashes to Ashes - A Comparison of Transcription Services



      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CCS '23: Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
        November 2023
        3722 pages

        Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.


        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 21 November 2023

        Check for updates


        • poster

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,261of6,999submissions,18%

        Upcoming Conference

        CCS '24
        ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
        October 14 - 18, 2024
        Salt Lake City , UT , USA
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.



      View online with eReader.